The Equality and Human Rights Commission has today issued guidance on the law relating to discriminatory advertisements. This is a welcome continuation of the EHRC’s return to robust, legally informed, analysis of anti-discrimaintion law in some ways and a mistaken interpretation that is practicably unworkable in others. In this post, I set out what I think the EHRC has gotten right and wrong in its analysis of the law relating to women-only occupational requirements.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Knowing Ius to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.