This is Part 2 of my analysis of the Judicial Review brought by the Good Law Project challenging the lawfulness of the EHRC interim update following the Supreme Court decision in For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers [2025] UKSC 16. In the first part (available here) I addressed the background legal context set out by the GLP. In this post, I will analyse the substantive grounds of review as advanced in the GLP’s Grounds of Claim.
