Hi everyone,
This is a bit of a different post from me. I’ve been extraordinarily busy with University work and some other projects that I’m working on. (If my editor is reading this, I’m still working on the book too, I promise!).
Because of this, I’ve not had the chance to write up something about Peggie v NHS Fife yet. I intend to get to that in the next few weeks and to make that available for everyone who would like to read it.
In the meantime, I’m going to try to organise a second Q&A session on the Substack app like we had with Naomi Cunningham. This one will just be with me so we will be able to discuss Peggie v NHS Fife.
If you have questions about the case, please reply to this post and I’ll collate the ones that I think will give us a well-rounded discussion.
The plan will be to go live at 7pm on Monday the 3rd of March, so get your questions in by Sunday.
As always, thank you so much for your support - I couldn’t do this without you.
Michael
Hi Michael
You have explained clearly in a number of threads (and in your discussion with Naomi) that the EA must be read as being compatible with the WR1992 (which are Assimilated EU law). This means that separate changing facilities at work must be provided based on sex.
There are still those arguing against this.
Would you be able to address this again, briefly, and to refute what this "former lawyer" is claiming?
https://x.com/ReactiveAshley/status/1893051962813235517
https://medium.com/@notashley/nhs-fife-v-bigots-what-the-law-says-about-trans-inclusive-policies-de613665cf74
Thank you!
Interested to get your thoughts on this: https://translucent.org.uk/transgender-employees-toilets-changing-rooms-and-the-workplace-health-safety-and-welfare-regulations-1992/